Traces of life in the environment reveal ecosystem health, prompting a scientific hunt for them.
By Jack McGovan
During her doctoral studies in 2009, Professor Kristy Deiner trudged around mountain lakes in the US state of California to help a scientist and park manager study frogs there.
A fungus-like pathogen was tearing through the amphibian population in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. What’s more, the frogs were threatened by the introduction of fish in the lakes.
Illuminating pools
‘What was really interesting for me was seeing how putting a new species in the lake changed all the other species in that ecosystem,’ said Deiner, who researches biodiversity and how to preserve it at Swiss university ETH Zürich.
She had her mind on far more than frogs and fish back then, wondering how many other forms of animal and plant life – some perhaps never documented – existed in those lakes and how they interacted.
Deiner leads a project that received EU funding to examine biodiversity through an unusual prism: environmental DNA, or eDNA, which gets shed into the environment by living organisms.
Deiner believes that eDNA can offer insights into species that are beyond the ability of the traditional detection method of human field observation. Called LeDNA, her project began in March 2020 and runs through February 2025.
Globally, wildlife populations have declined 69% on average over the past 50 years. In the EU, four-fifths of habitats are in a poor state and one in three bee and butterfly species is in decline.
Scientists are calling the dramatic loss of biodiversity worldwide the sixth mass extinction. Unlike the previous five die-offs dating back millions of years, the current one is driven primarily by human activities, including land, water and energy use and associated pollution.
By collecting eDNA, Deiner hopes to make more accurate assessments of biodiversity and even discover new species.
The EU plans binding targets for restoration of all ecosystems needing it by 2050 – a goal that the study of eDNA could facilitate.
Because eDNA gets moved around by rivers and streams and often ends up in lakes, Deiner believes they’re the best place to collect it.
‘If we just sample the lakes, we might be able to get all the life that’s living in this entire catchment for a very little amount of effort,’ she said.
Big idea, big test
To put the idea to the test, LeDNA plans a global “citizen science” survey on 22 May 2024 – World Biodiversity Day.
People around the world will be enlisted to take samples in a bid to determine whether using lakes to detect eDNA works on a large scale.
The LeDNA researchers have developed a special sampling device that they plan to make available to the participants.
The goal is for 1 200 lakes to be tested. The LeDNA team is still recruiting participants and teaching them how to use the sampling tool.
The device is a capsule that functions the same way as a regular eDNA collection capsule: as water passes through, a filter collects the eDNA.
But unlike the normal device, the LeDNA one can operate without expensive equipment, according to Deiner, who declined to elaborate because of a pending patent application.
‘We wanted to try and make something very simple that even somebody who has no scientific background could use,’ she said.
Once collected, the samples will be sent back to ETH Zürich and data will be shared openly.
New lens
Deiner wishes she had had such an instrument in 2009 in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. She suspected at the time the lakes would contain eDNA, but no ways existed to extract it.
‘I didn’t know how to collect the eDNA back then,’ Deiner said.
If the new method proves successful, she said that a much clearer picture of all the life forms on Earth could emerge.
That life has often evolved over millions of years and can be extremely adaptable, offering the prospect of important new insights into the preservation of biodiversity.
‘That’s just irreplaceable,’ Deiner said. ‘Life is pretty resilient, so if it’s given a chance it can regenerate.’
Forest focus
While she and her team concentrate on eDNA in lakes, other EU-funded researchers are hunting for it in forests because they too are a potentially rich source.
Called BIOSPACE, this project got underway in September 2019 and is due to run until the end of August 2024. The researchers are focusing on bacteria, fungi and the microarthropod microbiome in forests.
The goal is to determine how certain characteristics like soil acidity, water content, leaf biochemicals and type of woodland influence forest microbiome ecosystems. Of particular interest is understanding how the forest habitat drives microbial species richness and composition.
‘By looking at environmental DNA within a teaspoon of soil, or on the surface or inside of a leaf, you can potentially identify the thousands of species teeming in the forest ecosystem,’ said Andrew Skidmore, a professor of spatial ecology at the University of Twente in the Netherlands.
He leads BIOSPACE, which has collected eDNA in temperate forests in the EU, including Finland, Germany and the Netherlands. The team has also used open source data from other research projects in North America.
Satellite support
For help on this front, the researchers are using images from satellites. Pictures from space help experts to draw connections between any specific spot on Earth and a range of areas with similar ecological characteristics.
By combining actual eDNA samples with satellite imagery, the team can predict microbial biodiversity over more extensive areas and timeframes.
That’s especially valuable given that myriad places on Earth have had no on-site biodiversity sampling whatsoever.
‘There are great areas of the globe with no recorded data at all,’ said Skidmore.
BIOSPACE has already predicted the relative abundance of microorganisms in three terrestrial ecosystems in North America – a research first for this field. This sets the stage for future assessments of how these microbes change over time.
Skidmore said that eDNA sampling of the kind being done by the project has another big advantage: it is systematic and unbiased.
He said that traditional information about biodiversity has often reflected what humans find appealing in particular species rather than what might be of most scientific value.
‘Much of our knowledge about what’s threatened and endangered comes essentially from what’s interesting to people,’ said Skidmore. ‘It’s time to give a voice to the lesser-known species too.’
Research in this article was funded by the EU via the European Research Council (ERC). The views of the interviewees don’t necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.
More info
This article was originally published in Horizon, the EU Research and Innovation Magazine.